The Portfolio Paradox: When More Brands Create Less Growth
For decades, scale was one of the defining advantages of large consumer companies. More brands, categories, geographies and SKUs could create broader distribution, purchasing leverage and greater access to consumers.
But scale can also create complexity.
As CPG companies confront slower category growth, value-conscious consumers and pressure on volume, an increasingly important strategic question is emerging:
Does every part of the portfolio still deserve to be there?
Recent industry activity suggests that many companies are asking precisely that question. McKinsey describes portfolio reshaping as a central theme in CPG, with companies divesting weaker-growth assets and reallocating capital toward core businesses and higher-growth categories. McKinsey & Company
The opportunity, however, isn’t simply to make the portfolio smaller.
Start with strategic fit
A portfolio review should begin with more than historical revenue.
Leadership needs to understand category attractiveness, consumer demand, competitive position, growth potential, margin structure and the company’s underlying right to win.
A large business in a structurally unattractive market may warrant a very different investment decision from a smaller business positioned in an expanding category.
Rationalization should create capacity
Removing brands or SKUs can reduce complexity and cost. But cost reduction alone doesn’t create a growth strategy.
The more important question is what the organization does with the resources it releases.
McKinsey’s 2026 food and beverage research, for example, highlights the potential operating benefits of SKU rationalization while arguing that portfolios need clear consumer value propositions and sharper choices about what should remain, be renovated, or exit. McKinsey & Company
Capital, marketing, innovation resources, supply-chain capacity and management attention can then be redirected toward opportunities with greater potential.
Concentration can become a growth advantage
Portfolio strategy therefore requires explicit choices:
Where should the company defend leadership?
Where should it accelerate investment?
Where can innovation expand the addressable market?
And where should it stop allocating resources simply because it always has?
Those choices become increasingly important when growth is harder to find.
The Signal
Portfolio simplification isn’t the strategy. Reallocation is.
The strategic objective is not to own fewer businesses or sell fewer products. It is to concentrate resources behind the categories, brands, markets and consumer propositions with the greatest potential to create future value.
In an environment where capital and consumer demand are both more contested, focus itself can become a source of growth.
STRATEGY | INTELLIGENCE
Portfolio Strategy · Resource Allocation · Market Intelligence · Growth Strategy · Strategic Planning